
SCIENTISM
SCIENTIFISM
2018–
ON GOING
A Parallel Avant-Garde Imagined by Syd Krochmalny
Between the shadows of Magism and the clarity of modern reason, Scientifism emerges as a poetic and visual avant-garde that never was — but could have been. Not as opposition, but as complement. Where Magism intuited the invisible through symbols, Scientifism sought to unveil it through laws. It imagines a school where art and science are not rival domains, but converging languages — two modes of deciphering the real.
This series of paintings is born from a radical premise: What if painting had embraced science not as explanation, but as vibration? What if optics, acoustics, mechanics, anatomy, and mathematics had been transformed into poetic matrices — as profound as myth, as sensual as color?
Drawing on the theories of Helmholtz, the synesthetic visions of René Ghil, and the experimental grammar of the Instrumentation Verbale, Scientifism envisions an art that rejects neither rigor nor emotion, neither precision nor mystery. In this imagined movement, form bends to frequency, light thickens into thought, color becomes resonance, and poetry serves as the architecture of the cosmos.
Far from illustrating science, Scientifism does not represent — it reformulates. It constructs an alternative visual syntax where the organic and the technical are no longer opposites, but intertwined expressions of matter in transformation. Each work proposes a perceptual threshold: a portal from the retinal to the conceptual, from the seen to the intuited.
Intuition is not denied, but subjected to experiment. Beauty is not ornamental, but the emergent harmony of tension and logic. Although Scientifism never crystallized as a historical movement, its phantom lingers: at the edges of modern abstraction, in scientific conceptualism, and in today’s techno-aesthetic practices.
Now, in an age where artificial intelligence and biotechnology are reshaping the boundaries of life and creation, Scientifism returns as a forgotten key — a rationalist poetics, an experimental art, a cosmology in which thought and sensation are not severed, but fused into a single cognitive-aesthetic gesture.
Introduction: René Ghil and the Secret Science of Poetry
For the Scientifism Project – Syd Krochmalny
René Ghil’s Verbal Instrumentation (L’Instrumentation Verbale), written at the turn of the 20th century, is one of the most ambitious and overlooked poetic treatises of modernity. In this visionary text, Ghil proposes a theory of poetry as rhythmic science, phonic architecture, and vibratory system. For him, language is not only a symbolic medium—it is a material force, capable of resonating with universal laws.
His concept of rhythm is not merely metric but physiological and emotional, arising from the very movement of thought. Words are not static containers of meaning, but sound-waves, shaped by vowel timbres, tonal color, and graphic gesture. Inspired by the physics of Helmholtz and the synesthetic intuitions of Wagner, Ghil imagines a total artform where emotion, idea, and sensation are bound together by the breath and voice of the poet.
Within the speculative framework of Scientifism, Ghil’s writing serves as a lost foundational text: a forgotten physics of the poetic, where thought becomes vibration, and color, sound, and symbol merge into a unified expressive system. His Verbal Instrumentation is not just a theory—it is a latent technology of perception. One that this parallel avant-garde claims, reactivates, and reimagines.
Verbal Instrumentation – The Evolving Rhythm
René Ghil
Part I
Summarizing the essential idea of “Scientific Poetry,” we may say that, in order to be valid, a work must awaken—through logical associations of ideas—the moved awareness of universal Laws and Rhythms.
Therefore, to be adequate to this task, poetic expression must be reclaimed at the very origins of the Word—where it begins as the guttural emotion of instinct. The Word must be restored to its phonetic value alongside its ideographic value, and returned to the measured movement of emotion—what is, in essence, true Rhythm.
Classical, Romantic, and Parnassian prosody—both in theory and in practice—defines Rhythm as the sense of regular and equidistant recurrence of numerical division. For it, the verse is the result of fixed numerical quantities, marked and divided by the predictable return of tonic stress, with no concern for the qualitative and quantitative values of sound. Rhythm, in this model, becomes a mechanical succession of strong and weak beats, into which the Idea must forcibly fit itself—whether mutilated or not—within a rigid framework imposed from without.
We, however, have ultimately defined Rhythm as “the movement of conscious Thought representative of natural and harmonious Forces.” And in Poetry—recalling that in our “instrumental” theory, Rhythm is inseparably dependent on both Idea and Word, simultaneously; that language consists of three elements (instinctive emotivity, phonetic imitation of phenomena, and the domains of feeling and thought); and that the origin of articulated sound is emotional, expressed directly in phonetic form—we affirm (as contained in our general definition) that, in its essential and physiological nature, Rhythm is the representation of the emotion released by the Idea, an emotion inseparable from it.
Emotion, then, is silently revealed through gesture: every emotion repeats itself in movements that are more or less equal. At its origin, it expressed itself by breaking silence through a guttural sound, a kind of sonic gesture. Phonetic expression is therefore a phenomenon of movement and duration, measurable in vibrations.
Emotion produced phonetic expression—an expression that, itself, imitates external phenomena through graphic form and color (consonants and vowels). Memory preserved, reproduced, and traditionalized that phonetic expression by constantly modulating it. This complex sensory vibration, representative of the universal phenomenon and its relation to the Being it stirs, when transformed in consciousness into feeling and thought, becomes simplified and abstracted into the schematic images of the Idea. Language thus became both phonetic and ideographic, the ideogram being simultaneously a simplification of phonetic complexity—which nonetheless retains its emotive potential within. Thus, in return, every moved thought, every idea evoked to resonate suggestively in the self (and there should be no other kind in poetry), will necessarily release around it the entire vibratory atmosphere it holds in potential, and will awaken—through movement—the full emotive sequence from which it arose. Participating in the gesture of emotion, traditionally and through repetition rendered rhythmic, and in the primordial cry of the same nature as that gesture, the Word-ideogram that expresses this thought and its emotion must also necessarily reclaim its phonetic value—that is, its diverse and emotive durations of vibration. Immediately, it will be completed by its other expressive dimension: graphic form and intensities of color. Thus, the Idea (for there is nothing in the mind that is not first in sensation), and the Word, originally a gesture and cry of emotivity, are indissolubly linked by a shared instinctive origin. Both are expressions of vibratory waves, and the Word externalizes this under the influence of consciousness. They are a sequence of movements measured by various emotive durations—and through this, they produce Rhythm. Part II It would be too long to summarize here the full complexity of my technique for verse and evolving rhythm, nor all that is encompassed in “Verbal Instrumentation”: harmonic construction of the sentence (replacing the traditional stanza), of the poem, of the book, of the whole work; the succession and recurrence of motifs, and so forth. For this, one must necessarily refer to En Méthode. Still, a few essential points should be shared… Originally a series of emotive cries, language possesses as its fundamental expressive values the vowels—vibratory durations of varying pitch and intensity—of which the consonants are merely modifications. The work of Helmholtz and Krazenstein on harmonics has demonstrated that vowels should be considered vocal timbres. Thus, words appear as multiple, supple, and modifiable elements, capable of composing a vast verbal symphony, under the evolving influence of the moved Idea. The poet must therefore embrace poetic language in its double—and yet unified—aspect: both phonetic and ideographic, so that both the usual meaning and the emotive value of the sound of words are required, and must resonate in concordance with the guiding Ideas of the poem. (“The passions have with sounds a powerful and secret link,” wrote Jean-Jacques Rousseau. “Thought, which belongs to light, expresses itself through speech, which belongs to sound,” Balzac observed incidentally.) Therefore, through spontaneous selection by the poet possessed by Emotion—selection of words that best express both ideographic and phonetic correspondence—the vocal timbres (vowel-sounds, completed or modified by consonants) will either resonate in their pure and distinct value, or interact with one another to generate every nuance of tonality. And all this, while a general tonal atmosphere for the poem will prevail. If the thought demands it, these timbres may even sustain a phrase monotonously—slow or fast—repeating the same sound at the same pitch and intensity. Or, through repeated passages, harmonically or inharmonically spaced and inverted, these sounding points will express an ideal undulation of thought and speech, echoing the waves of the universe. Thought and its speech, one and the same principle and destination of Rhythm, become a conscious and emotional unity, fulfilling our fundamental concept that “a poetic work has value only insofar as it extends as a suggestion of the laws that govern and unite the total Being of the world.” Poetically, every idea must be moved, that is, it must return—within an emotive atmosphere—the expressive presence of the three original elements. Thus I have determined the most general and consistent correspondences between the various emotional and critical faculties of the human spirit, and the different groups of timbres or vocal instruments (vowels and consonants), through which words—considered as sounds—are diversely characterized. Part III Now, sound, the cry of emotion, is originally equivalent to a gesture, as we have said—a vibratory release of more or less intensity and duration. Under the expansive power of the Idea—expressing itself emotionally through the dramatic succession of vocal timbres—Rhythm is thus marked and measured essentially by their vibratory values, in a continuous and variable drawing of sound-waves, of all lengths and intensities. (Recent experiments by Dr. Marage and M. Marichelle on the photography of speech offer valuable new support for this idea.) At each of its phases, or within their nuances, the Idea marks its tonic accent through various heights and intensities of emotional sound. The evolving Idea expresses itself by creating its own evolving Rhythm—a rhythm that is essentially the externalization of emotion, which reactivates the sensory causes that first gave rise to it. (We now understand why verses with identical metric measures may nonetheless differ in speed. Beyond the syllabic count, it is the varied and nuanced vibratory duration of the vocal timbres—and nothing else—from which derive those accelerations and delays of which Becq de Fouquières speaks, without realizing that the poet, even if he fractures numerical meters at will, will still be betrayed by the inherent slowness or speed of the verbal sounds themselves.) This scientific rhythm, evolving from the very evolution of thought, is nevertheless still measurable metrically. That is to say, within the verse, the various rhythmic divisions, propelled by the Idea, are both marked and sustained by sounds of specific vibratory quantities, and are also measurable syllabically. These are eurythmic or dissonant measures, depending on whether the metric combinations derive from the multiplication or addition of the numbers two and three. The twelve-syllable alexandrine is retained as a continuous unit of measurement… For we hold that the twelve-foot measure is necessary, organic: it has its equivalent in all primary metrical systems, both ancient and modern. The reason is evidently physiological: this meter corresponds to the duration of a full breath. Its divisions also hold organic value, because in the time of full expiration, emotion, feeling, and idea inscribe accented intervals. However, it was not previously recognized that two reasons stand against equal divisions or equidistant intervals such as classical caesuras. First, as we have seen, thought generates its own unique and varied rhythm, without any preconception. Second, the properties of pitch, intensity, and duration of sounds or vocal timbres, which are integral parts of this rhythm—through their unequal durations—determine, along with the Idea and through it, the placement of accented beats throughout the total expiration. Part IV Now, Verbal Instrumentation gives to poetic speech its full and necessary meaning by restoring to it its primordial element of phonic reality. It becomes graphic and plastic through the morphological determination of Rhythm, and through the harmonious unity of the poem within the book, and the books within the composed and singular Work. It becomes pictorial, since it admits a coloration of vocal timbres and determines it as well. Through its Rhythm—measured in vibrations sparked by the Idea—it communicates with the molecular movements of the world. It thus synthesizes all forms of art, in order to express, with dramatic energy—in the sense of passionate and moving action—“the movement of conscious Thought representative of natural and harmonious Forces.”
A Counterfactual Origin of Modern Art
Had Scientifism emerged as a fully developed artistic movement in the late 19th century—alongside René Ghil’s poetic experiments and his theory of Instrumentation Verbale—it could have positioned itself as a foundational bridge between Symbolism, scientific rationalism, and modern abstraction. By fusing acoustics, optics, and metaphysical inquiry into a visual language, Scientifism would have anticipated key aspects of several later movements: the synesthetic ambitions of Kandinsky’s abstraction, the mathematical rigor of Constructivism, the structural clarity of Concrete Art, and even the conceptual strategies of artists such as Marcel Duchamp and Joseph Kosuth. In this counterfactual timeline, Scientifism would not simply precede these developments—it would prepare the ground for them, establishing an art that thinks, measures, vibrates, and speculates in equal measure.
Diagram of a Breath
by Syd Krochmalny
A tone is born
not in the throat,
but in the friction
between memory and molecule.
The vowel O
oscillates in gold—
a solar residue
spinning in my spine.
Behind the eye,
a pulse of geometry:
triangle, spiral, nerve.
Instruments without names
hang from the ceiling of the self,
recording the weather
of every thought.
My mouth is not a metaphor—
it is a chamber of resonant laws.
My tongue touches
the mathematics of desire.
I do not write.
I conduct frequencies
across the dark tissue
of silence.
And every poem
is a measurement
of time,
in the form of colored sound.
SCIENTIFIC POETRY
By Florian Parmentier
Origins
Symbolism was, at its origin, a reaction against Naturalism, whose materialist tendencies were rejected by the poets. There is something curious in the history of the 19th century: it was at once the century of Science and the century that produced the most poets. Literature was affected by this duality: Romanticism, Parnassianism, and Symbolism represent the poetic faction, while scientists and pseudo-scientists supported Naturalism. In prose, there was also an intermediate school—psychologism, led by Paul Bourget.
Yet poetry was not immune to the scientistic concerns of the time. On the contrary, it became increasingly infused with metaphysics. From this convergence emerged a school that sought to merge the two impulses: Scientific Poetry, as proposed by René Ghil.
Verbal Instrumentation
Acclaimed in 1886, at the age of 24, as one of the leaders of a new poetic movement (alongside Verlaine and Mallarmé, who were twenty years his senior), René Ghil distanced himself from Symbolism the following year, just as it was consolidating as a doctrine. However, his theory of Verbal Instrumentation had already profoundly influenced his generation—and even his elders.
The keyboard of vowel correspondences he established intuitively (and later confirmed through the discoveries of physicist Helmholtz on acoustics and harmonics) astonished his contemporaries, guiding many of them into new explorations of verbal music. His system was grounded in the organic laws of human speech. It is undeniable that, at the moment of intuitive shock, certain bodily movements occur in synchrony with emotion—movements that are, in fact, Rhythm. Rhythm and the verb must “reawaken the sensory causes that produced them.” This means that they are not governed by arbitrary rules, but by natural phenomena. Thus, Verbal Instrumentation “restores to poetic discourse its full and necessary meaning by returning to it its primordial element of phonality,” along with its “imitative value, graphic trace, and color intensities”—elements essential to the analogical structure of language, together with its evolving rhythm. The Technique René Ghil’s technique can only be fully appreciated by those familiar with his complete body of work. To illustrate his Instrumentation verbale, consider the following verses selected at random: And you, beat-flat, beat-high. Man of the tam-tam of the Blacks, beat softly: on the tam-tam of sweet and high dusks and of so, so many suns! beat- flat, beat-flat, beat-high a tam-tam of Moon. Beat with a long, dull strike!... It answers you to the feet that strike the western earth, while the night at its end, upon his head, places the round sun. — in equal times, it answers you with the blow of his mallet on the tong-tong, the one of the Round-headed and small Men, whose aromatic nights gild the skin. He who, with two soft hammers, strikes the flint as much as voices and fingers in a hand: who, from drops of multiple rain beneath the sun — while from the rooftops, peacocks of stiff sound fill with splendor a slowly transcending tension of time — who, from bouncing droplets of gold and water, strikes the flints, strikes the hard, multivocal flint in the dance of the Sun and the greened Peacock. Doctrine and Reaction Ghil’s technical principles were embraced by many young poets oriented toward modernity. However, the scientific doctrine he promoted, though it influenced nearly all poets of the time (often unconsciously), did not solidify as a dominant school. In 1884, Ghil laid the groundwork for his singular, unified poetic project with Légendes d'âmes et de sangs, where he had already introduced a scientific basis for poetic emotion. But when the Traité du Verbe was republished in 1888—more clearly defining his philosophical system—many young poets, unable or unwilling to grasp his vision, turned instead to Mallarmé. Only a handful of contributors to Écrits pour l’Art, the journal of a group that would dissolve in 1892, remained loyal to Ghil. Cosmogony, Metaphysics, Ethics, Aesthetics According to Ghil’s philosophy, Matter does not exist as such—it becomes. And in its becoming, it evolves toward self-awareness. Since even minerals possess a rudimentary form of consciousness, one must attribute to Energy-Matter a directionality—a will toward expansion and total consciousness. How does this evolution unfold? Through an energetic property of dual effect present in all matter: persistence (or resistance) and tension toward greater-being. This duality generates struggle, affinity, combinations, and unstable equilibria—in other words, evolution. To resolve the conflict between monism and pluralism, one must postulate that within the homogeneous, amorphous, energy-charged substance lies a double primordial state: resistance and tension. From this emerge two poles—negative and positive corpuscular manifestations. The evolution of the heterogeneous (as perceived through our limited grasp of space-time) becomes an analysis of the universe tending toward synthesis. This framework allows us to dissolve the old opposition between materialism and spiritualism, as the latter is nothing but a higher degree of the former. In short, Matter in motion can be thought of as a trinity: The One: unconscious persistence. The Two: tension toward transformation. The Three: the imbalance that triggers creation. By rooting this metaphysical system in scientific and evolutionary data, Ghil reinterprets the ancient Hindu Trimurti through a modern, scientific lens But evolution is not linear—it is both progressive and regressive, unfolding through expansions and contractions. Hence Ghil chose the ellipse as its symbolic figure. Effort and Harmony From all of this, one concludes that greater effort is a cosmic necessity. Yet struggle is not the end of the universe, as Darwin or Spencer proposed—it is merely the means. The true aim is greater harmony among all analytic elements. Thus, Goodness and Beauty—which share a common origin—become, through the intervention of human consciousness, the fruits of heightened effort. Ghil’s Aesthetic Ghil’s aesthetics are based on the relationship between the human being, currently the most developed and synthetic consciousness in the universe, and that very universe. These relationships operate primarily through the senses. As Ghil wrote: “There is nothing in the mind that did not first pass through the senses.” The poet’s task is thus to invoke and harmonize new relationships, to “consciously recreate an emotional harmony of the Universe.” But scattered intuitions no longer suffice—this is where science comes in: to expand the poet’s cerebral capacity. In doing so, the poet, in constant union with the essence of things, offers Matter the means to recreate itself—consciously and completely. Challenges to Symbolism and Scientism It must be said that this brief summary omits many essential details. Still, it reveals the vast scope of Ghil’s vision: a full cosmogony, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics. Such a system inevitably alienated many poets. By temperament, poets are independent, ungovernable. They reject any yoke imposed upon their creative instincts. If they join a school, it is under the condition that their inner freedom remains untouched. To follow the master of Scientific Poetry was to submit to the narrow confines of a rigid doctrine. If one strayed, one became their own system—and thus, a rival school. By contrast, Mallarmé's theories, offering greater imaginative freedom, drew many more disciples. Ghil’s Monumental Work The strict discipline of Ghil’s scientific school discouraged both impulsive poets and lazy writers. Ghil rejected poetic egotism and the fragmentary verse collection, insisting instead on the necessity of a vast, coherent, singular Work—one whose structure existed in vision before a single line was written. His poetic project can be summarized as follows: A chemical poem of radioactive matter. The emergence of chaos and the birth of the atom. The manifestation of life and the genesis of worlds. Prehistory and the germination of thought. The evolution of beings and the first human communities. Ritual, worship of natural energies, and transition to modernity. The decline of intuition and the rise of material progress. The overproduction of industrialism. The struggle to integrate nature as an extension of the human body. The synthesis of Eastern and Western philosophies. The final synthesis. Even if one disagrees with his ideas, it is hard not to admire the titanic ambition of his life’s work. For twenty-five years, Ghil worked on this monumental project, sustained by an unwavering personal vow. His Verbal Instrumentation marked an entire literary era. Though not all his ideas were adopted, their subterranean influence shaped the poetic imagination of the century. Ghil persevered—without seeking fame—convinced that his path was the true one.

Selected Bibliography: Scientifism
Primary Sources
Core theoretical, poetic, and scientific works that directly inform the epistemology, aesthetics, and foundational grammar of Scientifism.
-
Ghil, René. Légende d'âmes et de sangs, Paris, L. Frinzine, 1885
-
Ghil, René. Traité du verbe, avec " Avant-dire " de Stéphane Mallarmé, Paris, Giraud, 1886
-
Ghil, René. Légendes de rêve et de sang, Livre II : Le Geste ingénu, Paris, L. Vanier, 1887
-
Ghil, René. Le Pantoun des pantoun, poème javanais, Paris et Batavia, 1902. Reproduit à l'identique et commenté dans Échelle et papillons – Le Pantoum de Jacques Jouet, Les Belles Lettres, 1998 ISBN 2-251-49008-6. Texte sur Gallica
-
Ghil, René. De la poésie scientifique, Paris, Gastein-Serge, 1909
-
Ghil, René. La tradition de poésie scientifique, Paris, Société littéraire de France, 1920
-
Ghil, René. Les dates et les œuvres : symbolisme et poésie scientifique, Paris, G. Crès, 1922
-
L’Instrumentation Verbale. Le rythme évoluant. In En Méthode à l’Œuvre, 1901.
-
Helmholtz, Hermann von. On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. 1863.
-
Parmentier, Florian. La Poésie Scientifique. Écrits pour l’Art, 1902.
-
Fechner, Gustav. Elements of Psychophysics. 1860.
-
Comte, Auguste. Cours de philosophie positive. 1830–1842.
Secondary Sources
-
Texts that interpret, expand upon, or resonate with the principles of Scientifism, including poetics, visual abstraction, and sound-image correspondences.
-
Kandinsky, Wassily. Concerning the Spiritual in Art. 1911.
-
Klee, Paul. Pedagogical Sketchbook. 1925.
-
Gabo, Naum. The Realistic Manifesto. 1920.
-
Moholy-Nagy, László. Vision in Motion. 1947.
-
Duchamp, Marcel. The Writings of Marcel Duchamp. Eds. Michel Sanouillet and Elmer Peterson, 1973.
Contextual Readings:
-
Parmentier, Florian. La littérature & l’époque: histoire de la littérature française de 1885 à nos jours.












